Good evening 
          sir!
        I am unfortunately 
          not familiar with Dr. Schwartz's work, no, however I certainly concur 
          with the idea that non-medicinal (such as psychological) methods can 
          affect the brain physically just as readily (and sometimes with greater 
          precision and effectiveness, and with fewer side-effects) than more 
          invasive techniques. A variety of studies demonstrate this. For example, 
          it has been found that both behavioural therapy and drug therapy result 
          in similar symptom reduction and similar neurochemical and metabolic 
          rate changes in patients. The reference is:
        Baxter, 
          LR Jr, Schwartz, JM, Bergman, KS, Szuba, MP, Guze, BH, Mazziotta, JC, 
          Alaxraki, A, Selin, CE, Ferng, HK, Munford, P, and et al. "Caudate 
          glucose metabolic rate changes with both drug and behavior therapy for 
          obsessive-compulsive disorder." Archives of General Psychiatry 
          49.9 (1992): 681-689
        In a sense 
          this should not be at all surprising, or revolutionary to either medical 
          doctors or the general public. After all, if environmental and psychological 
          factors could not change neurology we would not ever grow or evolve 
          as individuals. Take school for instance: with each attended class new 
          connections and patterns are learned on the psychological level and, 
          at the neurological level, our synaptic densities increase. Ongoing 
          research such as that at McMaster University with Dr. Larry Roberts 
          also continues to demonstrate the plasticity of the brain as well.
        Given 
          this, many non-physical (to use your term) treatments can be discovered 
          and used to change the physical. Habit Reversal Training, for instance, 
          has been showed in many studies to be far superior to drug therapy in 
          eliminating problem tics. As of 2007 it has also now been officially identified as a 'well-established, evidence-based practice' as per criteria from the American Psychological Association (APA). Research into HRT (or, what they now call CBIT) traditionally often went unnoticed (and unfunded) given that there is a lot more money to 
          be made in pharmaceuticals. To learn exactly how to do HRT or CBIT you may wish to pick up a copy of my book Nix Your Tics!
        Psychological treatments, while life-long 
          and generalizable, also tend to require more work and time than many 
          in an  "ignore it, minimize it, drug it, or fix it quick somehow 
          so I don't have to think about it anymore" society.
        Thank 
          you for an intriguing email sir! Have an excellent evening,
          Dr. Dunc.